ASUS Maximus VII Hero Review

May 15, 2014 | 10:15

Tags: #9-series #atx #best-z97-motherboard #crossfire #lga1150 #m2 #maximus-vii #motherboard #republic-of-gamers #rog #sli #z97

Companies: #asus

Performance Analysis

In our Media Benchmarks, the overall score of 2,465 was just 12 points behind the fastest Z97 chipset result on test, highlighting a fairly close running of most of the boards at stock speed. Gaming at stock speeds is on par with most of the other boards, though the ASRock is ahead a little in Skyrim. At out maximum overclock of 4.8GHz, the Hero managed the fastest overall score on test in our media benchmarks, with a score of 2,970, although this was only 64 points ahead of the ASRock Fatal1ty Z97 Killer.

ASUS Maximus VII Hero Review ASUS Maximus VII Hero Review - Performance Analysis and Conclusion
Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Overclocked, the Hero is joint fastest in Skyrim too and has a higher average frame rate than most other boards in Shogun 2 as well. Z97 SATA speeds are a few MB/sec behind some other contenders, but it's nothing to be concerned about. The ASMedia ports lag behind significantly, with read and write speeds of 388MB/sec and 385MB/sec respectively. That said, this is typically always the case with third party SATA controllers – the MSI Gaming 7 uses an ASMedia controller to and has very similar speeds on those ports. Finally, idle power consumption is a little high at 57W, but conversely under load the Hero is one of the best. Only the Ranger has a lower stock speed power consumption under load, and when overclocked the two boards are tied for the joint lowest wattage of 180W, 14W less than ASRock's board.

ASUS Maximus VII Hero Review ASUS Maximus VII Hero Review - Performance Analysis and Conclusion
Click to enlarge

[center]Click to enlarge

Conclusion

In the end, the difference that is most obvious between the Ranger and the Hero is still the £35 one. The extra LEDs, power circuitry and SATA ports are all valid additions, but in terms of performance and functionality the two are still vastly similar. The boosted power circuitry may be responsible for the slightly better overclock, but this is an advantage on paper only given that performance and power consumption are virtually identical.

The Hero is by no means a bad motherboard, and it may show its differences more with Devil's Canyon or Broadwell CPUs, but for now, at least, we'd suggest saving yourself some cash and opting for the Ranger. Meanwhile, if you need the extra SATA ports, then MSI's Gaming 7 is an excellent purchase, especially as it can be had for £135.

Click to enlarge

*Edit* We welcome comments from manufacturers in reply to our reviews and we've spoken at length to Asus about the Maximus VII Hero as it had concerns over our portrayal of the additional features it has over the cheaper Maximus VII Ranger. The Hero now costs just £156 which is barely £20 more than the Ranger.

Click to enlarge

Our initial concerns are still true in that if you're not fussed about the lighting, beefed up power circuitry and SATA ports, then the Ranger will save some cash, however, at time of writing the difference was a more significant £35. At just £20, there's clearly a stronger argument for opting for the Hero's extensive lighting (this is bit-tech after all!) and additional power circuitry. The latter didn't seem to make much difference with our Core i7-4770K but you can now see for yourself if the lighting is worth the extra dosh.

Discuss this in the forums

Posted by [USRF]Obiwan - Thu May 15 2014 09:48

Based on the reviews of all the 'Z-boards' I would go for the cheapest board with the features that suit my needs. The performance differences are unnoticeable at all or so close to each other you can only see the it on a graph.

Posted by David164v8 - Thu May 15 2014 10:09

Could you include some impressions of the onboard sound? All the motherboard manufacturers are emphasising improved audio, and it would nice to see how they compare to each other, and dedicated soundcards.

Posted by daletur328 - Thu May 15 2014 10:57

Speed test utilising SSD is great to compare against older boards, but as a major upgrade on the z97 platform it's M.2, why not include this in the review?
As an upgrade is in my near future, if its proven to be worth while, a new M.2 would be included.

Posted by SchizoFrog - Thu May 15 2014 12:08

ASUS used to stand head and shoulders above the rest in terms of quality and reliability which were often good reasons to justify paying more for an ASUS product. Over recent years other manufacturers have gained on them, especially MSI who seem to be able to match ASUS on these fronts while also matching of even beating them in terms of features and price. MSI did some Voodoo style magic with their M-ITX Z87 board which had excellent performance while being significantly cheaper and then there is MSI's current offer of free hardware such as the Corsair H75 with certain purchases while still undercutting ASUS's price in the first place.
Those totally loyal to ASUS will still likely stay with them but like many others, I will have to seriously consider a board from someone else this time around as ASUS just doesn't seem worth it right now.
null
  • Speed
    37 / 45
  • Features
    28 / 30
  • Value
    18 / 25

Score guide
Where to buy

Overall 83%
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

In line with recent changes to data protection legislation in the UK and Europe we would like to direct you to our updated Privacy Policy here.